Tampilkan postingan dengan label video. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label video. Tampilkan semua postingan

Sabtu, 19 Mei 2012

TERRORIST (?)

Rating:★★★★★
Category:Music
Genre: Rap & Hip-Hop
Artist:LOWKEY


Lowkey - Terrorist (Lyrics)

They're calling me a terrorist
Like they don't know who the terror is
When they put it on me, I tell them this
I'm all about peace and love
They calling me a terrorist
Like they don't know who the terror is
Insulting my intelligence
Oh how these people judge..

It seems like the Rag-heads and Paki's are worrying your Dad
But your dad's favourite food is curry and kebab
It's funny but it's sad how they make your mummy hurry with her bags
Rather read The Sun than study all the facts
Tell me, what's the bigger threat to human society
BAE Systems or home made IED's
Remote controlled drones killing off human lives
Or man with home made bomb committing suicide
I know you were terrified when you saw the towers fall
It's all terror but some forms are more powerful
It seems nuts how could there be such agony
When more Israeli's die from peanut allergies
It's like the definition didn't ever exist
I guess it's all just depending who your nemesis is
Irrelevent how eloquent the rheteric peddler is
They're telling us fibs, now tell us who the real terrorist is

They're calling me a terrorist
Like they don't know who the terror is
When they put it on me, I tell them this
I'm all about peace and love
They calling me a terrorist
Like they don't know who the terror is
Insulting my intelligence
Oh how these people judge..

Lumumba was democracy - Mossadegh was democracy
Allende was democracy - Hypocrisy it bothers me
Call you terrorists if you don't wanna be a colony
We used to bow down to a policy of robbery
Is terrorism my lyrics?
When more vietnam vets kill themselves after the war than die in it?
This is very basic..
One nation in the world has over a thousand military bases
They say it's religion, when clearly it isn't
It's not just Muslims that oppose your imperialism
Is Hugo Chavez a Muslim? Nah.. I didn't think so
Is Castro a Muslim? Nah.. I didn't think so
It's like the definition didn't ever exist
I guess it's all just depending who your nemesis is
Irrelevent how eloquent the rheteric peddler is
They're telling us fibs, now tell us who the terrorist is

They're calling me a terrorist
Like they don't know who the terror is
When they put it on me, I tell them this
I'm all about peace and love
They calling me a terrorist
Like they don't know who the terror is
Insulting my intelligence
Oh how these people judge..

Jumat, 18 Mei 2012

Mantan Marinir AS beberkan bukti terorisme yg dilakukannya




TRANSKRIP:
JON MICHAEL TURNER: Selamat siang. Nama saya Jon Michael Turner. Saat ini saya tinggal di Burlington, Vermont. Saya bertugas dengan Kompi Kilo, 3rd Batalyon, 8th Marinir sebagai penembak senapan mesin otomatis. Ada istilah, “Sekali seorang Marinir, selalu Marinir.” Tapi ada juga istilah, “Makanlah apel, persetan dengan korps, saya tidak bekerja untuk Anda lagi.”

AMY GOODMAN: Itu Jon Michael Turner, melepas medali dan pita dari dadanya dan melemparkannya ke penonton disambut tepuk tangan dari hadirin pada acara Winter Soldier. Turner kemudian melanjutkan untuk menjelaskan beberapa hal waktu dia di Irak.

JON MICHAEL TURNER: Pada tanggal 18 April 2006, pembunuhan pertama saya. Orang ini tidak bersalah. Saya tidak tahu namanya. Aku memanggilnya “si gemuk”, Dia berjalan kembali ke rumahnya.”, Dan aku menembaknya di depan teman dan ayahnya. Berondongan pertama tidak membunuhnya, setelah saya menembaknya di sini di daerah lehernya. Dan setelah itu ia mulai berteriak dan melihat langsung ke mata saya. Jadi saya melihat ke teman saya, teman jaga saya, dan saya berkata, “Yah, aku tidak bisa membiarkan itu terjadi.” Jadi saya mengambil tembakan lain dan membunuhnya. Dia kemudian dibawa pergi oleh anggota keluarganya yang lain. Butuh tujuh orang untuk membawa tubuhnya pergi.

Kami semua diberi ucapan selamat setelah pembunuhan pertama kami, dan sayalah yang melakukannya. Komandan kompi saya secara pribadi mengucapkan selamat kepada saya, seperti yang dilakukannya semua orang di kompi kami. Ini adalah individu yang sama yang menyatakan bahwa siapa pun yang melakukan pembunuhan pertama mereka dengan menusuk mereka sampai mati akan mendapatkan libur empat hari ketika kita kembali dari Irak.

Ada satu insiden, di mana kita masuk ke sebuah baku tembak sekitar 2.000 meter di selatan pusat pemerintahan. Kami tidak tahu di mana tembakan berasal. Dan aturan cara kami itu, menentukan di mana tembakan berasal dan menembakkan roket kearahnya. Jadi, sperti yang telah disebut, kita masih tidak tahu dari mana tembakan itu berasal, dan roket 84 milimeter ditembak ke sebuah rumah. Saya tidak tahu apakah ada orang di dalamnya. Kami tidak tahu apakah dari sana tembakan berasal. Tapi itulah yang dilakukan.

Silakan ke gambar berikutnya. Orang ini adalah yang ketiga dipastikan tewas. Seperti yang Anda lihat, dia mengendarai sepedanya. Kemudian pada hari itu, kami pergi ke depan, dan kami bersama wartawan CBS Lara Logan, tapi dengan skuad lainnya, sehingga dia tidak bersama kami. Jadi, saya dan dua orang lainnya pergi ke depan dan membunuh beberapa individu, karena kami gembira dengan baku tembak kami baru saja kami alami, dan kami tidak bersama kamerawan atau wartawati itu dengan kami. Bisa dikatakan, jika setiap kali kami bersama wartawan, tindakan kami akan berubah drastis. Kami tidak pernah bertindak sama. Kami selalu terkontrol dengan segala sesuatu, melakukan segala sesuatu sesuai dengan buku. Orang di sepeda, dia ditinggalkan di jalan sekitar sepuluh menit sampai kami menyadari bahwa kami perlu untuk meninggalkan tempat kami. Dan tubuhnya diseret sekitar sepuluh kaki di sebelah kanannya, di mana tubuhnya terlempar di balik tembok batu dan sepedanya terlempar di atas dia.

Hal lain yang sering kali biasa kita lakukan adalah mengenali dengan tembakan, di mana kita akan pergi ke depan dan mencoba untuk memulai baku tembak jika kita merasa terancam dengan cara apapun, bentuk atau formasi. Ada satu kejadian tertentu di mana kami bekerja dengan Angkatan Darat Irak dan Pasukan Khusus Irak di pusat kota Ramadi, dan dengan skuad kami dan Tentara Irak ada juga letnan kolonel, mayor, sersan pertama dan sersan – maaf, sersan utama. Tentara Irak akan masuk ke rumah, menendang pintu dan kemudian pergi ke depan dan menembak. Dan ada semburan keras tembakan senapan mesin. Kami pikir kami ditembaki, tapi kemudian kita baru tahu bahwa itu adalah mereka.

Penggerebekan rumah – karena kami batalyon pelacak, kami bertanggung jawab atas beberapa patroli. Banyak penggerebekan dan patroli yang kami lakukan pada malam hari sekitar 3:00 pagi, sekitar itu. Dan apa yang kita lakukan hanya menendang pintu dan meneror keluarga. Itu adalah gambar yang diambil sekitar 3:00 pagi melalui kacamata night vision. Dan itu adalah pemisahan perempuan dan anak-anak dengan para laki-laki. Jika pria di rumah memberi kami masalah, kami akan melakukan sesuatu pada mereka jika kami merasa perlu, apakah mencekik dia atau membenturkan kepalanya ke dinding. Jika Anda lihat kembali ke gambar satu, yang satu orang yang tidak diambil – yang diperlakukan dengan cara yang sangat buruk, karena semua kabel yang dia miliki. Kami menganggapnya material pembuatan IED (bom).

Pada pergelangan tangan saya, ada bahasa Arab untuk “f Anda.” Saya mendapat yang menempatkan di pergelangan tangan saya hanya dua minggu sebelum kami pergi ke Irak, karena itu adalah tangan tersedak saya, dan setiap saat saya merasa perlu untuk melakukan agresi, saya akan menggunakannya.

Silakan ke gambar berikutnya. Berikutnya, ada sebuah contoh dari tahanan dan bagaimana mereka diperlakukan dengan cara yang baik.

Berikutnya, yaitu menara Masjid Fatima. Seperti yang Anda lihat, itu sarat dengan lubang peluru dan lubang di atasnya. Mereka berasal dari mortir. Dan video berikutnya bahwa aku akan menunjukkan kepada Anda adalah peluru tank yang ditembakkan ke dalam menara, di mana kami tidak yakin jika kami sedang ditembaki atau tidak. Sebenarnya, aku akan bicara tentang ini. Hal ini setelah salah satu orang di sebuah kompi senjata telah ditembaki. Ini adalah cara kita melakukan agresi kita. Bagi anda yang belum tahu, adalah ilegal untuk menembak ke dalam masjid, kecuali Anda ditembaki dari arah itu. Tidak ada tembakan dari masjid itu. Itu ditembak ke dalam karena kita marah.

Bisakah Anda memainkan video berikutnya?
[Klip] Kami berada di [tidak terdengar], mencoba menekan menara biru-putih bernama Madinat al-Zahra. Hellraiser, Hellraiser, silakan. Anda dapat memindahkan tank sekitar pintu ganti- pada pintu masjid. Tembakkan lagi Kilo Dua. Woo F**k yeah!

gambar selanjutnya. Itu – OK, bisa dikatakan, ada banyak cerita dan insiden lain yang saya alami dan ingin dibicarakan, meskipun kita tidak memiliki waktu. Tapi ini hanya untuk menunjukkan bahwa itu adalah efek lanjutan berondongan tank. Ini hanya untuk menunjukkan bahwa setiap orang duduk di sini memiliki cerita ini, dan telah ada lebih dari satu juta perjalanan yang telah pergi dan keluar dari Irak, sehingga kemungkinan (kejadiannya) tidak terbatas.

Gambar berikutnya, silakan. Alasan saya melakukan ini sekarang bukan hanya untuk diri saya sendiri dan untuk didengar seluruh masyarakat, tapi untuk semua mereka yang tidak bisa berada di sini untuk berbicara tentang hal yang kita lalui, berbicara tentang hal-hal yang kami lakukan.

gambar berikutnya. Keempat salib dan ini adalah upacara peringatan untuk lima orang di Kompi Kilo, Batalyon 3, 8th Marinir kami yang hilang. Sepanjang unit kami, kami memiliki delapan belas yang terbunuh. Itulah kesaksian saya. Saya hanya ingin mengatakan bahwa saya menyesal untuk kebencian dan kehancuran yang saya lakukan pada orang yang tidak bersalah, dan saya minta maaf atas kebencian dan perusakan yang lain telah diderita orang tak bersalah. Pada satu titik, itu oke. Tetapi kenyataannya telah menunjukkan bahwa itu tidak dan bahwa hal ini terjadi dan sampai orang mendengar tentang apa yang terjadi dengan perang ini, akan terus terjadi dan orang-orang akan terus mati. Saya minta maaf untuk hal-hal yang saya lakukan. Saya bukan lagi monster yang dulu. Terima kasih.

AMY GOODMAN: Mantan Marinir, Jon Michael Turner, berperang dengan Batalyon 3, Marinir ke-8. Video dan foto prajurit yang ditunjukkan dapat dilihat di website kami democracynow.org

Selasa, 31 Januari 2012

Taliban Achievements in Afghanistan! (1994-01)






TRANSCRIPT OF THE SPEECH



IN THE NAME OF ALLAH, THE MOST COMPASSIONATE, THE MOST MERCIFUL

LECTURE: Taliban in Afghanistan

Syed Rahmatullah Hashimi

(Senior Advisor to Amir ul-Mu'mineen, Mullah 'Umar, Afghanistan)


MARCH 10, 2001

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA,

LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA



*Note: [--] Indicate words that were not heard clearly in the recording.

I was just coming from [a meeting with] a group of scholars, and the first thing we started there was the statues. And the first thing we started here was also the statues. It s very unfortunate how little we see and how little we know. And it really confuses me, if people really know that
little or not. Nobody has seen the problems of Afghanistan; nobody saw their problems before. And the only thing that represents Afghanistan today are the statues.

The problem of Afghanistan was not new. As you know that Afghanistan is called, The Crossroads of Asia. So, we are suffering because of our geo-strategic location. We have suffered in the 18th century, 19th century, and we are still suffering in this century.

We have not attacked the British. We have not attacked the Russians. It was them who attacked us. So the problems in Afghanistan you see is not our creation. That reflects the image of the world. If you don t like the image in the mirror, do not break the mirror; break your face.

The problems in Afghanistan started in 1979. Afghanistan was a peaceful country and it was doing its own job. The Russians, along with their 140,000 troops attacked Afghanistan in the December of 1979, just 21 years ago, stayed there for a decade, killed one and a half million people, maimed one million more people, and six million out of the eighteen million people migrated because of the Russian brutalities. Even today, our children are dying because of the landmines that they planted for us. And nobody knows about this.

After the Russians left during the Russian occupation, on the other side, the American government, the British government, the French, the Chinese, and all of the rest, supported the counter-revolutionaries called the Mujahideen; 7 parties only in Pakistan and 8 parties in Iran who fought the Russian occupation. And after the Russians left, these parties went into Afghanistan. All of them had different ideologies, a lot of weapon[s]. And instead of having a single administration, they fought in Afghanistan. The destruction that they brought was worse than the destruction the Russians brought. 63,000 people were only killed in the capitol, Kabul. Seeing all this chaos, and the complete destruction of our country, and I don t have to forget that after the Soviets left, another million people migrated because of the lawlessness that existed in
Afghanistan 7 million people.

So seeing this destruction and lawlessness, a group of students called the Taliban (Taliban is the plural word of students in our language; it may be two students in Arabic, but in our language it means students) so a group of students started a movement called the Movement of Students. It first started in a village in the southern province of Afghanistan, called Kandahar. It happened when a war-lord, or a commander abducted two minor girls, raped them, and the parents of those girls went to a school and asked the teacher of the school to help them. The teacher of that school, along with his 53 students, finding only 16 guns, went and attacked the base of that commander. After releasing those two girls, they hanged that commander, and so many of their [the commander s] people were also hanged. This story was told everywhere; and this was called the terrorist story of the Taliban, or the Students. BBC also quoted this story. Seeing or hearing this story, many other students joined this movement and started disarming the rest of the warlords, who were worse than these. I will not prolong this story so far, this same students movement controls 95% of the country; they captured the capitol, including the four major cities. And only a bunch of those warlords are remaining in the northern corridor of Afghanistan.

So our achievements are as follows. We are in a government for only five years, and the following things that we have done, and many of you may not know:


* The first thing we have done is reunify the fragmented country. Afghanistan was formerly fragmented into five parts. The first thing we have done is to reunify that country. The United Nations, the United States, everybody was confused as to how to reunify that country, and
nobody could do it. First thing we have done is to reunify that country.

* Second thing we have done, which everybody failed to do, was disarming a population. After dealing [with] the war of the Russians, and the Americans I would say, every Afghan got a Kalashnikov, and even sophisticated weapons such as stinger missiles, and they even got fighter planes and fighter helicopters. So disarming these people was impossible. The United Nations in 1992 passed an appeal asking for 3 billion dollars to re-purchase that arms, to start a process of repurchasing those arms. And suddenly, because of its impracticalibility, that plan never materialized, and everybody forgot about Afghanistan. So the second thing we have done is to disarm 95% of that country.

* And the third thing that we have done is to establish a single administration under Afghanistan, which did not exist for 10 years.

* And the fourth achievement that we have that is surprising to everybody is that we have eradicated 75% of all worlds Opium cultivation. Afghanistan produced 75% of all worlds Opium. The drug, you know that Opium? The Narcotics business? And last year we issued an
edict asking the people to stop growing Opium, and this year, the United Nations Drug Control Program, UNDCP, and their head, [Mr.] Barnard F., proudly announced that there was 0% of Opium cultivation. Not at all. And this was not a good news for UN itself because many of them lost their jobs. In the UNDCP, 700 so called experts were working there and they got their salaries and they! never went into Afghanistan. So when we issued this edict, I know that they were not happy. And this year they lost their jobs. And this was our fourth achievement.

* The fifth achievement that we have, but it s a little controversial, some of our friends will not know is the restoration of Human rights. Now, YOU may think that is a violation of Human Rights, but from OUR perspective that is the restoration of Human Rights. Because usually [among] the fundamental rights of a human being is the right to Live. Before us, nobody could live peacefully in Afghanistan. So the first thing we have done, begun [to give] to the people is a secure and peaceful life. The second major thing that we have restored is to give them free and fair justice; you don t have to buy justice, unlike here. You will have justice freely. And you have criticized us for violating women s rights; now, who knows what happened before us. Only some symbolic schools, or symbolic posts were given to some women in the ministry, and that was called the restoration of women s rights. I can see some Afghans living here, and they will agree with me, that in the rural areas of Afghanistan, women were used as animals. They were SOLD actually. The first thing we have done is to give the self-determination to women, and it happened not in the history of Afghanistan. Throughout the history of Afghanistan, during all the so-called civilized kings or whatever, they didn t give this right to women, so women were sold.! They didn t have the right to select their husbands, or to reject their husbands. First thing we have done is to let them choose their future. And you will know that throughout south Asia, women are killed under the title of honor killings. It happens when a woman s relation is detected with a man, whether or not the relation was sexual, they're both killed. But now this is not happening in our country. And the third thing that happened only in Afghanistan, was women were exchanged as gifts; this was not something religious; this was something cultural. When two tribal tribes were fighting among themselves, then in order to get their tribal issue reconciliated, they would exchange women, and then [they]! would make, or announce reconciliation. And this has been stopped. If we [had to give] fundamental rights of woman, we had to start from zero; we couldn t jump in the middle. Now you ve asked me about the rights of women s education and the rights of women's work. Unlike what is said here, women do work in Afghanistan. You're right that until 1997 I mean, in 1996 when we captured the capitol Kabul, we did ask women to stay home. It didn t mean that we wanted them to stay at home forever, but nobody listened to us. We said that there is no law, and there is no order, and have to stay at home. They were raped before us, ever! yday. So, after we disarmed the people, and after we brought law and order, and now women are working. You are right that women are not working in the ministry of defense, like here. We don t want our women to be fighter pilot[s], or to be used as objects of decoration for advertisements. But they do work. They work in the Ministry of Health, Interior, Ministry of Education, Ministry of Social Affairs, and so on. So, and we don t have any problem with women s education. We have said that we want education, and we will have education whether or not we are under anybody s pressure, because that is part of our belief. We are ordered to do that. When we say that there should be segregated schools, it does not mean that we don t want our
women to be educated. It is true that we are against co-education; but it is not true that we are against women s education. We do have schools even now, but the problem is the resources. We cannot expand these programs. Before, our government there were numerous curriculums that
were going on; there were curriculums which preached the king for the kings, and there were curriculums which preached for the communists, and there were curriculums from all these seven parties [the previously mentioned]. So, the Students were confused as to what to study, and the first we have done today is to unify that curriculum, and that s going on. But we are criticized, and we say that instead of criticism, if you just help us once, that will make a difference. Because criticism will not make a difference. If you [talk?] criticism from New York, thousands of miles away, we don t care. But if you come there and help us, we do care. So actually there are more girls students studying in the faculty of medical sciences than boys are. This is not me who is saying this, it is the United Nations who has announced this. Recently we reopened the faculty of medical science in all major cities of Afghanistan and in Kandahar, there are more girl students than boys. But they are segregated. And the Swedish committees have also established schools for girls. I know they are not enough, but that s what we can do. So, that
is what I say that we have restored. I don t say we are 100% perfect, and nobody will say that they are 100% perfect. We do have shortcomings, and we do need to amend our policies. But we can t do everything over night.

* And the sixth problem, that we are... is it sixth or seventh? Seventh I think the seventh problem that we are accused of is Terrorism, or the existence of terrorists in Afghanistan. And for Americans terrorism or terrorist means only bin Laden. Now you will not know that Afghanistan,
or bin Laden was in Afghanistan 17 years before even we existed. Bin Laden was in Afghanistan, fought the Soviet Union, and Mr. Ronald Reagan, the president of America in that time, and Dick, Mr. Dick Chaney called such people freedom fighters or the Heroes of Independence, because they were fighting for their cause. So Osama bin Laden was one of those guys who was instigated by such media reports, so in that provocation by these countries to go to Afghanistan and fight the Soviets there. And now when the Soviet Union is fragmented, such people were not needed anymore, and they were transformed into terrorists from heroes to terrorists. So exactly like Mr. Yassir Arafat was transformed from a terrorist to a hero. So we don t know as to what is the definition of Terrorism. We do regret that the terrorists were actually horrific acts and they were terrorist acts. But if they are terrorist acts, what is the difference between those terrorist acts and the attacks on Afghanistan when in 1998 attacks, cruise missile attacks on Afghanistan. Neither of the two were declared and both of them killed civilians. So we are confused as to what is the definition of Terrorism. If it means killing civilians blindly, both of them killed civilians blindly. And the fact is, I m not going to be offensive or rude, or rude about this, I m going to be frank. And I think it s sometimes honest to be rude. If the United States that it has acted for its defense, lets see. The United States government tried to kill a man without even giving him a fair trial. In 1998, they just sent cruise missiles into Afghanistan and they announced that they were trying to kill Osama bin Laden. We didn't know Osama bin Laden then. I didn t know him; he was just a simple man. So we were all shocked. I was one of those men who was sitting at home at night, I was called for an immediate council meeting and we all were told the United States have attacked Afghanistan. With 75 cruise missiles and trying to kill one man. And they missed that man; killed 19 other students and never apologized for those killings. So what would you do if you were in our status; if we were to go and send 75 cruise missiles into the United States and say that we were going to kill a man that we thought not believed that we thought was responsible for our embassy, and we missed that man, and we killed 19 other Americans what would the United States do? An instant declaration of war. But we we! re polite. We didn't declare war. We had a lot of problems at home; we didn't t want further problem[s]. And since then, we are very open-minded on this issue. We have said, that if really this man is involved in the Kenya/Tanzania acts, if anybody can give us proof or evidence about his involvement in these horrific acts, we will punish him. Nobody gave us evidence. We put him on trial for 45 days and nobody gave us any kind of evidence. The fact is that the United States told us they did not believe in our judicial system. We were surprised as to what kind of judicial system they have. They showed us as to what they are doing to the people they just tried to kill a man without even giving him a fair trial, even if one of us is a criminal here, the police is not going to blow his house, he must go to a court first. So, that was rejected. Our first proposal, despite all these things, was rejected. They said they will not believe in our judicial system, and we must give him to New York. The second proposal that we gave after the rejection of this first proposal we gave was, we are ready to accept an international monitoring group to come into Afghanistan and monitor this man s activities in Afghanistan. So that he does nothing. Even that he has no telecommunications [--]. That proposal was also rejected. And the third proposal we gave, six months ago, was that we were ready, that we were ready to try or accept a third Islamic country s decision, or the trial of [--] in a third Islamic country, with consent of Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan that was also rejected. So we don t know, as to what is the problem behind. If bin Laden was the only issue, we are still very open minded, and for the fourth time, I m here, with a letter from my leadership that I m going to submit to the state department hoping that they will resolve the problem. But I don t think so [that] they'll solve the problem. Because we think, and I personally think now that maybe the United States is looking for a Boogy Man always. Remember what Gorbachev said? He said, that he s going to do the worst thing ever to the United States. And everybody thought that he s going to blow the United States with nuclear weapon[s]. But he said, "I m going to remove their enemy". And then he fragmented Soviet Union. And he was right. After he fragmented Soviet Union, a lot of people lost their jobs in the Pentagon, in the CIA, and the FBI, because they were not needed anymore. So we think that maybe these guys are looking for a Boogy Man now. Maybe they want to justify their annual budget, maybe they want to make their citizens feel that they are still needed to defend them. Afghanistan is not a terrorist state; we cannot even make a needle. How are we going to be a terrorist state? How are we going to be a threat to the world? If the world terrorism is really derived from the word terror , then there are countries making weapons of mass destruction, countries making nuclear weapons, forest deforestation, soil, air, and water pollution they are terrorist states; we are not. We cannot even make a needle; how are we going to be a threat to the world? So as I said in the beginning, the situation in Afghanistan is not our creation. The situation in Afghanistan reflects the world s image. If you don t like the image in the mirror, do not break the mirror; break your face.

Now, we are under sanctions. And the sanctions have caused a lot of problems, despite that we are going under so many problems, the 23 years of continuous war, the total destruction of our infrastructure, and the problem of refugees, and the problem of land mines in our agricultural
lands, all of a sudden the United Nations, with the provocation of Russia, is imposing sanctions on Afghanistan. And the sanctions have been approved; we are under sanctions. Several hundred children died a month ago, here it is (holds up pamphlet). Seven hundred children died because of malnutrition and the severe cold weather. Nobody even talked about that. Everybody knows about t! he statues. For us, we are surprised, that the world is destroying our future with economic sanctions, then they have no right to worry about our past. Everybody is saying that they are destroying their heritage they don t have any right to talk about that. They are destroying the future of our children with economic sanctions, how are they going to justify talking about our past? I know it s not rational and logical to blow the statues for, for retaliation of economic sanctions. But this is how it is. I called, after this announcements, I called my headquarters, and I found out, I was really confused, I asked them, why are they going to blow the statues, and I talked to the head of the council of scholars of people, who had actually decided this, he told me that UNESCO and NGO from Sweden, or from one of these Scandinavian countries Norway, Sweden, one of these they had actually come, with a project of rebuilding the face of these statues, which have worn by rain. So the council of people had told them to spend that money in saving the lives of these children, instead of spending that money to [restore these] statues. And these guys said that, No, this money is only for the statues. And the people were really pissed off. They said that, If you don t care about our children, we are going to blow those statues.

[Person from the Audience yells, Takbeer! ]

[Audience responds, Allahu Akbar! ]

I don t say that he s right or wrong, the decision is yours. Think of yourself. If you are in such a problem, what would you do? If your children are dying in front of your eyes, and you are under sanctions, and then the same people who have imposed sanctions and are coming and
building statues here? What will you do? So, I talked to my headquarters today, and they said that the statues have not been blown so far. But the people are so angry. They are really angry, they want to blow them. And there is Kofi Annan is going, you know Kofi Annan, the Secretary General of United Nations? He went to [--], to Pakistan, and he said he s going to meet our representative there. This man never bothered to enter, to talk about these children, he never bothered himself to talk about six million refugees, and he never talked about [the] poverty of Afghanistan. He only goes to that region because of these statues. And the OIC is also, they ve also sent a mission to go to Kabul and talk about those statues. So we re really confused. That the world is really caring about the statues, and then they don t care about human beings. I don t say we have to retaliate in blowing the statues; we have not done that. But if we were to destroy those statues! , we would have destroyed them three years before now, because we captured those areas those areas three years before now. We didn t want to blow them. And now the situation has come, and it s not our decision. This is the decision of the scholars and the people. And that is the decision has been approved by the Supreme Court. We cannot reject this decision. So these guys are there, the OIC and some, even I think some ministers from different countries are there to save the lives of these statutes. I think they will not be blown because of the concerns of these people. But it is really, really ridiculous. These people do no! t care about children, about people who are dying there, about the foreign interference that still exists, they only care about the statues. And I m sure they don t care about our heritage. They don t care about our heritage; they only care about their picnic site one time. Maybe they ll have a good picnic site there, seeing those statues. They don t care about our heritage, I m sure. If they were to care about our past, they wouldn t destroy our future. And I m sure these sanctions which are imposed on our government will never change us, because for us, our ideology is everything. To try to change our ideology with economic sanctions will never work. It may work i! n the United States, where the economy is everything, but for us, our ideology is everything. [--] And we believe that it is better to die for something than to live for nothing.

We are still open-minded. We are still, we have still opened our doors for negotiations, but our offices are closed everywhere our office was closed in New York a week ago. They are trying to shut our offices in other countries, trying to isolate us, and they don t know that isolation is
counter-productive. Because they don t have experts; the only experts they have are those people who speak English. They don t even speak the language. Those experts who are advising the sanctions, or the sanction committee have not even been to Afghanistan. And they are setting benchmarks for us to achieve.

I m prolonging this speech, I m sorry, because I have been repeating it everywhere, so I may have left some thing in it, and I will let you ask me questions.

[Applause from Audience]



***Important Note: What follows are some of the answers to some of the questions that were asked during the Question and Answer session. Most of the questions were not included due to the poor recording. Apologies for the inconvenience.***

[A questioner asks about the statement he heard on the radio from the Afghan former minister (Mutawakkil) confirming that the statues have been destroyed, and further adds, Does that mean the statues of Hindus and Sikhs will also be destroyed? He further asked that since the destruction of the statues was done in retaliation, Was it really saving the children? (it was asked in a provocative manner)]

Thank you very much and unfortunately again, the first question is the statues. So the statues as I told you, have not been destroyed so far. And I have contacted my headquarters there, and if they were destroyed, then people would not bother going there; as I told you Kofi Annan is there, OIC is there, and our foreign minister is there. And for us, as he [the questioner] said that Mutawakkil has said that [that the statues have been destroyed], I don t think he has said that they are destroyed. He said that [that the statues have not been destroyed]. And I don t reject this. They raised an edict which says these [the statues] should be! blown. And we are not against Buddhists; absolutely wrong. We are not against any religion. There are Hindus living in Afghanistan; there are different religions. There is one man who is a Jew living in Afghanistan.

[Audience laughs]

So we are not against any religion. And there is no Buddhist in Afghanistan, this I can say. In our religion, if anything, you can leave anything until it is not harmful to you. If these Buddhas were not harmful to us, so far. But now when the money is going to Buddhas reconstruction, and the children are dying next door, we think it's harmful now. Not we think, the people think. And I told you that this decision is taken by the council of scholars and the council of people. And has been approved by the Supreme Court. And the media is saying everywhere that it is an edict by our leadership. Have you ever seen our leadership on TV? Have you ever seen or heard him (Mullah Umar) on international radio? He has never been on radio, so it's absolutely wrong that we issued an edict. I do agree that there is an edict, but by the council of people and the scholars, and has been approved by the Supreme Court, but has not been implemented so far. Is it enough? You know, really, I am asked so much about these statues that I have a headache now. If I go back to Afghanistan, I will blow them.

[Audience laughs]

[Questioner asks about the infighting between Mujahideens now. He asks, in the past we knew that there was one common enemy (the Russians) and it was easy to support the Mujahideen but now it s the groups of Mujahideens fighting between each other. How do you explain this?]

They [the different Mujahideen groups] killed so many people, and there were so many problem[s]. And that s why we started our movement. It s all in these people. They didn't t fight for Shari ah, or they didn't fight for Afghanistan, they only fought for their future post in power. So we, as I told you that, we finished that. And only now, we have one opposition headed by Ahmed Shah Masood. And we don t have much problems with him. We had talks with his representative in Ashkabad in Ramadhaan this year, and I was there. So, we say that he failed in bringing about a constitution, a unified gove! rnment; he could not even unify the capitol, Kabul. So we did all these things. So we asked him, despite that he controls nothing, except 5% in the mountains, and we have said we are still open-minded. We agree that he should have a post, because he has fought the Russians. And in `98, we agreed on a joint government; actually, I was also there, so we agreed in giving them three ministries and accepting their judicial system merging with our judicial system, and giving them three or four district or provincial governors or something like that. And they agreed on that. Our, on our part, we asked them to give us their weapons, because the problem in Afghanistan is not political differences. The problem in Afghanis! tan is the weapons. Everybody has had weapons, and now if they are fighting us, it is not because of our very much ideological differences; it s because of weapons. There were a lot of weapons before, and you know, the Afghans will know that so many times they tried to have one government and then after a week or so, they fought, because all of them got different defense ministries, and they would fight. So now we have said that the problems in Afghanistan is not the political problem; it is the arms which exist. We are, we will accept them to be in our government if he accepts to give his arms to the Ministers of Defense. We have no problem however.

[A questioner asked, As Salaamu `Alaykum wa Rahmatullaahi wa Barakaatuh. Brother, Afghanistan is now supposed to be a Muslim country, Insha Allah. And these statues are just like the statues in Makkah, when Rasoolillah (saws) came to Makkah, and it was the very first thing that he did was to destroy the statues. What is taking us so long? Why aren't they destroyed already? [Audience laughs, some say Takbeer]

So, I don t know what to say. We don t have any Buddhists as I told you; we have to look at the problems of the Muslim minorities in some countries. So we do not want to create problems for them, that' s why we are still waiting, and we hope that we will resolve this problem.


[ A written question read, What is your opinion about killing the Iranian officers in Heraat in 1998? ]

So, there is this story about seven nine, nine Iranians, one of them was a journalist, and the rest of them were called diplomats. It happened in `98 when we were capturing a city in the north of Afghanistan called Mazar-e-Shareef when we were, we announced before our campaign in
liberating that city, we announced that all diplomats of organizations, including the UN, the diplomatic missions, and NGOs to evacuate because of the possible fighting that may happen in the city too. So, all of them evacuated, the United Nations, the NGOs, and even those people who
actually bombed them, they also evacuated, so the only people who remained there was some seven, or eight, night Iranians, who were actually not diplomats, who were actually military advisors to their puppets in Afghanistan. So, and we didn t kill them in di! plomatic mission; they
were killed on their way to Bamiyan; Bamiyan is another city in central Afghanistan, so they were and we didn t want to kill them; they just died because of the shelling that happened. And we issued an edict, and we declared that we were sorry for what happened. And now the Iranian
government has also sent their mission, and when I was coming there, three of their villages were in Afghanistan; they reopened their consulate here and I think they have re-thought their policies now and maybe they will have a new chapter of friendship with us and I hope it will happen.

[Question asked about how people, especially Muslims, need to be educated about the situation in Afghanistan. He went on further to ask about whether or not he would be under a physical threat if he were to shave his beard and walk into Afghanistan, or if a sister would be under a physical threat if a sister were to wear Hijab according to the Islamic standards, not wearing Burqah.]

You say that all the Muslims, or all the people, must be educated on the situation in Afghanistan. And now I am thinking that first they must be de-educated to try to understand what we are saying. There are not [--], they are really trying how to approach, and you are right, and I agree
that you must have Public Relations, in teaching people, or at least, letting them know what we say. But as I told you that we have other priorities. Our priority is to save the children. Our priority is to de-mine our country. Our priority is to reunify our country. Our priority is to stop the foreign! interference. Our priority is to fight the [--] that is already operating in our country. So for us to talk about Public Relations, it is important, but it cannot what would you do if you were in this status? And it is not easy to do Public Relations. You have to spend a lot of money. I will tell you a story of CNN. CNN was in Afghanistan interviewing bin Laden, in `98. You have to be careful in listening to this. I was there, and they asked bin Laden as to what was the thinking about the killing of civilians in Iraq. After three hours of formal conversation, and the camera was rolling. He said, that if all American citizens and if all British citizens are willing, or supporting, to kill all Iraqi civ! ilians, then all American citizens and all British citizens deserve the same thing or to be killed. CNN cut everything. Three-hour conversation was not there, only thing they put was and it was not complete the only clause that they said was, the independent clause of what he said, they said that, all American and British citizens must be killed. This is what came on the air. But he didn t mean this. And I know that all Americans do not support the killing [of] civilians there. Not even a quarter of that. That was impossible. But now what they taught their people was that bin Laden is saying that all American civilians must be killed. That is the story of media, and the media here is very irresponsible. They are commercialized, and they'll do anything for selling advertisements.

He [the questioner] talked about the beard and the veil. First of all, for all non-Afghans, this rule does not apply. So there are many non-Afghans who are working there; there are actually Americans who are working there in the UN, there are many people from different parts of the world. And they do whatever [--], they don t care. And we don t have a law for them. But Afghanistan is a country that has gone through 23 years of war, and there is still war, and the military is mixed with the people. Then you must have some sort of strict law, in order to insure
security and peace in Afghanistan. So, maybe it is ridiculous for you that we ask people to grow beards, but this is what, it is in Afghanistan, and the Afghans do leave beard, whether or not you tell them. And it s something natural, and it s something [--]. And regarding the veil, or the Burqas, or the Islamic dress code, that is something that exists in Afghanistan for centuries. And it does exist in Iran, it does exist in Saudi Arabia, it exists in many Islamic countries. It has nothing to do only with Afghanistan. And it does even exist here. So you can t force people not to have Burqas, and we do have that constitution that at this time, women should cover up. For us because our priority is that they should be safe.

[Questioner asks about what Afghans living in the US can do for Afghanistan. She also gives a brief account of her experience in Afghanistan, when she traveled there recently, and gave proof that schools existed there, and that the situation there is much better, more peaceful than it was six years ago. She traveled alone, all over the country.]

Thank you very much. I m very happy that at least I found a proof!

[Audience laughs]

I m thankful to you [for] what you say, and I really appreciate the emotions you have for your country. I myself, I m 24, and serving my country. I could play football now, and I could even play here, and I could stay in the United States, but I don't do any of those things I serve my country. So I agree that whatever, all those things that exist in Afghanistan, maybe there are many things that we don t want, but they do exist. So we are not a sponsor for that. They did exist for two decade[s]. So the best thing to do for Afghanistan is to have an association of Afghans to raise funds, and the best thing I would say [is to] educate people. Instead of criticism, they can come there! and open a school. They can open a school for girls, for boys. But that would be the best thing. Unfortunately some of our Afghans are sitting in their air-conditioning rooms here, play their TV s, and when they have nothing to do, then they criticize us because we can t make Europe for them. We can do it, we have a lot of problems, but the first thing they should do is to stop harming us. They have to come and help us, in all the sectors. We do need all the Afghans from here. If they really criticize our policies, they should come there and criticize our policies, not from here. So the best thing for ! you is for you people to raise funds, do NOT give it to us, one of you should come there, help the people.

[Questioner: Do you respect our right to tell you that if you didn t believe in PR, you wouldn t be here right now. [--] Actually I d like to ask you, does your version of Islam preach hate? I don t know, I m asking you; do you believe in the religion of hate? Because I was very disgusted when that lady got up and asked you why don t you blow those idols, because that boy right there (points to a boy in the audience) laughed. MSA Representative interrupts, Please ask your question. Questioner, I m asking you, are you preaching hate? MSA Representative, Is that your question? Questioner, That is the question. He continues to argue.]

Enough? I don t know what to say but you only expressed your emotions. Islam means Peace. First you have to understand. And a peaceful religion will never preach for Hate. And we do not preach for Hate. And you said that if we didn t believe in Public Relations, I wouldn t be here. It s
my first time here, and I ve waited for an American Visa for a long time, and I m not used to doing these things. I brought a letter from my leadership that I explained before that I will be submitting to the leader of the administration here, and hoping that they will re-think their policies. So I do believe that, I say that we must believe in Public Relations because they are very important. But I say that Public Relations needs a lot resources, and at this time we have resources for the [--] for the plight of our people.

[Questioner: I actually agree with you about the western media; they are very biased [--], but looking at people like him (the young boy who laughed) at such a young age [--]. ]

[Small dispute in the Audience]

[Father of young boy: He is my son, ok, and you have come here to accuse him..[--]. MSA Representatives calm both parties and rest of Audience, and apologizes to audience.]

[Questioner asks about women being required to have a male escort whenever they go out. She also questions whether or not if she were to go into Afghanistan wearing what she was now (a jilbab and hijab) would she be under any physical threat.]

You [the questioner] said, told me about whether a woman was allowed to go without a male escort. I m here, and my wife is shopping in Kandahar now. So they don t have to be escorted, this is absolutely wrong. Yes, they were, in those cities that we captured first, because that was for their safety. Now, they don t have to. And I don t have any problem with whatever you wear, and women do wear the same thing that you do wear, and they don t have any problems. And I say that those cities, which are close to the frontline and there is military operations going on close, there are thousands of military soldiers of ours, we do ask women to avoid the social areas. Now you re not understanding what I mean, but some of our friends here do understand. In a country that is in a war, the military is mixed with the people, and there are certain
limitations. So I can t go beyond that, and I say that women does not have to be escorted. I m here now and my wife is shopping maybe in Kandahar.

[Questioner asks What is Afghanistan s priority in regards to establishing an Islamic state for all Muslims, not just for Afghans? ]

He'd like to destroy us.

[Audience laughs]

We have our first headache in Afghanistan, and that s a big headache. We have a full-time job there. If we were worked 24 hours a day, we will hardly ever be able to re-construct an [--] Islamic system in our own country. And we have no intention of going beyond our borders, and
neither we can. So, all these people who exist in other countries, or their policies, they have nothing to do with us. We are only concerned about Afghanistan. And please do not try to make assumptions. Ask me questions. I was asked in... I was in Bay Area just yesterday, a journalist asked me, Why do you hate women? And I told him, Why do you beat your wife? And he said, I don t beat my wife. I said, I don t hate women.

[Audience laughs]

So you have to ask me questions. You just make assumptions. You just make an assumption. Like he said, you explain for one hour, for five minutes saying the same thing again and again, you ve made an assumption. You didn t ask me whether a woman must be escorted or not
this is an easy question. But if you say, Why are you doing this , Why are you doing... We re not doing it. The question is, here, you don t have to make assumptions.

[Questioner: My country (Iran) is suffering from drug-trafficking from Afghanistan; you said that you [--] drugs from your area, but how can you explain this contradiction? You have said that you cannot even make a needle, what does it mean..? ]

I would like to answer this question first and then I will not forget. I said Afghanistan produced 75% of all worlds Opium, 75% of all worlds. And we eradicated it last year. And this was announced not only by United Nations, who rejects this? All of them know it was announced by Iranian government [--]. I don t say it was we eradicated five years ago [it was] this year. United Nations announced ...


[Questioner: You mean 2001? So that s two months ago?? But our country is still suffering from that?! He continues to argue]

Please, please try to hear what I m saying.

[Questioner continues to talk and argue, MSA representatives try to calm him down.]

[Questioner goes on, I know, but this is the question I wanted to ask ...]

My brother, listen to me. You say that your country is still suffering from Opium from Afghanistan. I do not say that we eradicated it five years ago. This year, the United Nations Drug Control Program, announced that there was 0% Opium cultivation; Iran, too, admitted that. So if you don t know that, your problem. New York Times announced this; it was in a New York Times editoral. So if you don t know this, then it s your problem. I do admit that there are still some piles of Opium that exists from the years before the last cultivation that may [have been sent] to
your country. But we will admit, that we have, and I told you that, there are missions for us, across Afghanistan, to Iran, to our country, and they are trying to eradicate the already existing Opium; it was not produced this year; it was produced the year before last.

[Questioner asks whether or not they have asked for a loan from the World Bank or IMF]

Not yet. We have not asked IMF neither the World Bank to help us. But if they do help us, we will no reject it. So we are not asking because we are not being recognized so we can t ask them for loans.

[Questioner : is a Political Scientist and is asking whether or not Bureaucrats and Technocrats are needed in Afghanistan because, according to him, the Taliban are not smart enough, suitable to be governing Afghanistan.]

We never say that we are perfect. The question is, Who could do more than we do? These seven parties? The Communists? Or the King? Who did this? The things that we have done? Who could do more than that? It s very easy to say, to criticize from here, Do this, do this, do that.. But it s very difficult to do that. You said that the Taliban are not Bureaucrats and Technocrats, and we re not going to change that. I m sorry to say, you know what the old king of Afghanistan, he was 88 years old, and he spent seven years living in Rome, he had bought an island there, and now this man wants to come back to Afghanistan and head the government. The old, rotten knucklehead.

[Audience laughs]

So, we were very surprised as to what did he do in 43 years of his government? He didn t do anything. He only knew how to decorate his palace. I m sorry to say this. And now the same man, after 43 years Sorry, 27 years, is willing to go back and govern; he cannot even take a
flight back to Afghanistan. He s too weak. So how s he going to? So we do need professionals. We don t say that we are perfect. And I repeat it again, we cannot come here, and ask everybody to come help us. We have asked so many times. Anybody willing to help their country, come and
help. And many people come and ask me, Well, how do we go? ..How did you come here?!

[Audience laughs]

And yeah, go there if women can go there, what is the problem? But if you ask us to give you the government, then that s difficult. So I agree with you that we need Technocrats, but we don t need politicians.



[END OF SESSION]

Senin, 17 Oktober 2011

Iwan fals - mata hati




Dalam ku sendiri
Coba mengerti
Perjalanan ini
Tak terasa disini

Aku disampingmu
Begitu pasti
Yang tak kumengerti
Masih saja terasa sepi

Matahari yang berangkat pulang
Tinggal jingga tersisa di jiwa
Bintang bintang menyimpan kenangan
Kita diam tak bisa bicara

Hanya mata
Hanya hati
Hanya kamu
Hanya aku

________________________

*lagu keren videonya keren (dapet dr youtube)

Jumat, 17 Desember 2010

John Pilger - The War You Don't See

Rating:★★★★★
Category:Movies
Genre: Documentary


The new film is a powerful and timely investigation into the media's role in war, tracing the history of 'embedded' and independent reporting from the carnage of World War One to the destruction of Hiroshima, and from the invasion of Vietnam to the current war in Afghanistan and disaster in Iraq. As weapons and propaganda become even more sophisticated, the nature of war is developing into an 'electronic battlefield' in which journalists play a key role, and civilians are the victims. But who is the real enemy?

John Pilger says in the film: "We journalists... have to be brave enough to defy those who seek our collusion in selling their latest bloody adventure in someone else's country... That means always challenging the official story, however patriotic that story may appear, however seductive and insidious it is. For propaganda relies on us in the media to aim its deceptions not at a far away country but at you at home... In this age of endless imperial war, the lives of countless men, women and children depend on the truth or their blood is on us... Those whose job it is to keep the record straight ought to be the voice of people, not power."

Includes an interview with WikiLeaks founder and editor-in-chief Julian Assange.

Minggu, 10 Oktober 2010

Belum Ada Judul




Belum Ada Judul
Iwan Fals ( Album Belum Ada Judul 1992 )

Pernah kita sama sama susah
Terperangkap didingin malam
Terjerumus dalam lubang jalanan
Digilas kaki sang waktu yang sombong
Terjerat mimpi yang indah
Lelah

Pernah kita sama sama rasakan
Panasnya mentari hanguskan hati
Sampai saat kita nyaris tak percaya
Bahwa roda nasib memang berputar
Sahabat masih ingatkah
Kau

Sementara hari terus berganti
Engkau pergi dengan dendam membara
Dihati

Cukup lama aku jalan sendiri
Tanpa teman yang sanggup mengerti
Hingga saat kita jumpa hari ini
Tajamnya matamu tikam jiwaku
Kau tampar bangkitkan aku
Sobat

Sementara hari terus berganti
Engkau pergi dengan dendam membara
Dihati

Minggu, 15 Agustus 2010

KOMPENI DAN OPASNYA DI ZAMAN SEKARANG

Kompeni dan Opas


Opas adalah penduduk pribumi yang menjual jiwa dan raga mereka kepada Kompeni demi secuil upah. Mereka tega menzalimi dan membunuh saudara se-Tanah Air mereka demi kenyangnya perut mereka sendiri. Memakai seragam layaknya tentara VOC sungguhan, dengan bangganya mereka menganggap diri mereka lebih terhormat daripada rakyat pribumi yang hanya memakai pakaian compang-camping seadanya. Selain cara pakaiannya, mereka jg berpesta dan berbicara layaknya Kompeni sungguhan, padahal kulit mereka sawo matang, hidung mereka pesek, rambut mereka hitam yg tdk membedakan dengan saudara pribumi lainnya. (disadur dari: Si Pitung, Kompeni & Opas)

Lalu bagaimanakah sosok Kompeni & Opas-nya pada zaman sekarang? Silahkan simak 3 video dibawah ini:


IDEOLOGI ISLAM VS IMPERIALISME AMERIKA
....
Kita seperti gurita raksasa yang mencengkram semuanya lalu selayaknya Santa Claus membagi-bagikannya kepada kita (warga AS) dan lihatlah kebohongan yang kita jalani ini, sementara 3/4 dunia hidup dalam kemelaratan. Setiap hari 24.000 orang mati karena kelaparan dan 30.000 anak mati karena wabah penyakit-penyakit yang tak bisa disembuhkan, setiap hari. Juga banyak orang yang tinggal di wilayah-wilayah yang penuh kemarahan, dan mereka melihat kita 5% populasi dunia meraup 25% dari sumberdaya mereka, sementara kebanyakan mereka sendiri hidup dalam kehidupan yang tragis, melarat, memprihatinkan dan menderita. -John Perkins (mantan Economic Hitman)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_lmGyuulRM




INDONESIA, NEGERI KAYA MENJADI NEGARA PENGEMIS:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=phTSnG4efdI

Indonesia adalah negeri di mana imperialisme lama bertemu dengan imperialisme baru. Ini adalah negeri yang tidak semestinya miskin, kaya dalam hampir segalanya: Tembaga dan emas, minyak, kayu, keahlian dan SDM-nya.

Dijajah oleh Belanda di abad ke-16, kekayaan Indonesia dirampas oleh Barat selama ratusan tahun. Hutang yang sesungguhnya sampai saat ini tak terbayar.
(John Pilger, Wartawan senior Australia & aktivis kemanusiaan)



AS DANAI DENSUS 88

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G3yjS_J59vk
Tahun 2006 - 2010 AS Memberikan Dana $57.4 Juta untuk pemberantasan Teroris
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RS22855.pdf

Dana AS yang mengalir kepada Polri untuk mendirikan unit khusus anti-teror di Indonesia sangat besar, dan setiap tahunnya mengalami peningkatan.

Berdasarkan dokumen Human Right Watch tentang Counter Terorism yang dilakukan AS, pembentukan Densus 88 di Indonesia pada tahun 2002 didanai AS sebesar 16 juta dollar, dan sebelumnya pada tahun 2001 Polri telah menerima dana untuk penanganan terorisme sebesar 10 juta dollar. (http://www.hrw.org/wr2k3/asia7.html)

DENSUS 88 = OPAS?

Sabtu, 17 Juli 2010

Padi - Harmoni (Lirik)




Aku mengenal dikau
Tak cukup lama, separuh usiaku
Namun begitu banyak pelajaran yang aku terima

Kau membuatku mengerti hidup ini
Kita terlahir bagai selembar kertas putih
Tinggal kulukis dengan tinta pesan damai
Dan terwujud harmoni

Segala kebaikan
Tak akan terhapus oleh kepahitan

Kulapangkan resah jiwa
Karena kupercaya kan berujung indah

Sabtu, 03 Juli 2010

Wawancara Norman Finkelstein dgn Future TV (Malay Subtitles)




"many of the most effective competitors will not be friendly to the United States and the West; but if the bottom line is a rejection of violence against the United States and its allies, they should be supported."

bukti apa lagi, yang terang benderang. Jelas sekali salah satu strategi yg cukup efektif untuk melanggengkan IMPERIUM IBLIS mereka harus mensupport kelompok2 yg 'membenci' mereka, tapi di sisi lain kelompok itu ANTI RESISTENSI (memberangus, konfrontasi) terhadap KEDZHOLIMAN mereka. Atau dengan nama lainnya adalah PSEUDO RESISTENCE, seolah2 mereka resis terhadap IMPERIUM IBLIS, tapi di sisi lain sangat menguntungkan si IMPERIUM dengan menabuh genderang ANTI PERLAWANAN atau yg mereka klaim REVOLUSI DAMAI!

siapa yg DANAI NON VIOLENCE ACTION/MOVEMENT? ASIA FOUNDATION N CS2 NYA! siapa yg PRO IBLIS?!!! SIAPA sebenernya SEKUTU IBLIS AMRIK?!!!

FAKTA SUDAH, LOGIKA SUDAH, SYARI'AT SUDAH JELAS, apa lagi kalo bukan HUBBU DUNYA WA KAROHIYATUL MAWUT!

I ain't no good Muslims, but the facts that I CAN NOT DENY!

Terjemah transkrip dialog:

Pakar Ilmu Politik dari Amerika Serikat

Future TV, Libanon
20 Januari 2008


Tentu saja saya senang bertemu dengan orang-orang Hizbullah.
Karena saya mendapatkan cara pandang yang jarang sekali kita temukan di Amerika Serikat.
Dan saya tidak mempunyai masalah untuk menyatakan solidaritas saya terhadap mereka.
dan saya tidak akan menjadi seorang pengecut dan munafik tentang hal itu.
Saya tidak peduli dengan Hizbullah sebagai organisasi politik.
Saya tidak tahu banyak tentang pergerakan politik mereka.
dan bagaimanapun, hal itu tidak relevan. Saya tidak hidup di Libanon.
Hal tersebut adalah pilihan dari warga Libanon:
Siapa yang ingin mereka jadikan pemimpin.

Siapa yang ingin mereka jadikan wakil.
Tapi ada hal yang bersifat asasi.
Manusia mempunya hak untuk membela negaranya dari penjajah asing.
Manusia mempunyai hak untuk membela negaranya dari penjajah yang menginvasi dan menghancurkan negaranya.
Dan hal tersebut adalah hal yang paling dasar, asasi dan pertanyaan yang tidak rumit.
Orang-tua saya mengalami perang dunia ke-2.
Dan, kondisi pada waktu rejim Stalin sama sekali tidak menyenangkan.
rejim stalin sangat kejam dan brutal, dan banyak orang yang binasa.
Tapi siapa yang tidak mendukung Uni Soviet ketika mereka mengalahkan Nazi?
Siapa yang tidak mendukung Red Army?
Di tiap negara di Eropa yang mereka duduki - siapa yang mendapatkan kehormatan? Yang melakukan perlawanan.
Dan perlawanan dari golongan Komunis sangatlah brutal, sangat kejam. Golongan Komunis tidaklah... golongan yang menyenangkan, tapi anda menghormati mereka.

Anda menghormati mereka karena mereka menolak para penjajah menduduki negeri mereka.
Dan jika saya akan memberi sikap hormat pada golongan Komunis selama Perang Dunia ke-2, walaupun saya tidak cocok dengan rejim mereka...jika saya akan menghormati mereka, Saya akan memberi sikap hormat pada Hizbullah.
Mereka menunjukkan keberanian, dan mereka menunjukkan disiplin. Saya menghormati hal itu.

Interviewer:
Yang disebutkan tadi adalah penjelasan yang yang akurat atas situasi sebelum tahun 2000, tapi setelah tahun 2000, orang-orang Israel keluar dari Selatan Libanon.
Ada ketegangan antara para praktisi politik Libanon atas isu yang masa akan datang mengenai senjata dan isu perlawanan.
Ketegangan yang terjadi ini,
Anda justru menjadi bagian darinya
Lagi pula, anda mengatakan bahwa anda hanya mengunjungi Libanon, tapi anda tidak melihat dampak dari perang Juli bagi masyarakat.

Norman:
Dengar, jika anda ingin menutup mata dan mempercayai bahwa situasi berakhir pada bulan May tahun 2000,
anda bisa saja melakukannya, anda bisa bermain-main dengan permainan tersebut (menghindar dari fakta).

Tapi pada kenyataan - dan tiap orang memahaminya -
bahwa sikap sikap Israel adalah:
Kita akan menumbangkan Hizbullah.
Mereka telah merencanakan perang baru
setelah mereka dipaksa untuk pergi pada tahun 2000..
Mereka membuat alasan, dalih, pada bulan Juli 2006,
tapi tidak ada pertanyaan lagi bagi orang-orang yang rasional bahwa israel tidak akan pernah membiarkan Hizbullah mengalami kemenangan.
Mereka memutuskan untuk mengajarkan...mereka..

Interviewer:
Perang tidak bisa dihindarkan.

Norman:
Memang tidak bisa dihindarkan.

Sangat tidak mungkin Amerika Serikat dan Israel akan membiarkan perlawanan di negara-negara Arab.
Jika anda ingin berpura-pura bahwa perang bisa dihindari, anda bisa bermain-main dengan kepura-puraan anda.
Tapi orang yang memperhatikan dengan serius, dan rasional, mengetahui bahwa akan ada perang lagi cepat atau lambat.
Apakah anda kira bahwa tidak akan ada perang lagi?
Apa anda kira bahwa Israel rela atas kekalahan mereka pada bulan Juli 2006?
Apakah anda ingin berpura-pura bahwa Hizbullah yang menjadi penyebab konflik?
Tidak, tentu akan ada perang lagi.
dan kerusakan mungkin bisa terjadi sepuluh kali lebih buruk -
bahkan bisa lebih - dari kerusakan di bulan Juli 2006,
karena Israel bersama Amerika Serikat memutuskan untuk membuat negara-negara Arab tetap diam dan tidak melakukan perlawanan.
Sekarang, bagaimana saya tidak boleh menghormati orang-orang yang menolak tindakan tersebut?
Anda tahu, selama Perang Saudara di Spanyol ada seorang wanita yang terkenal - mereka memanggil dia "La Pasionaria" - Dolores Ibarruri, dari Republik Spanyol.

Dia terkenal dengan pernyataannya:
"Lebih baik untuk mati berdiri daripada hidup dengan merangkak di depan anda".

Interviewer:
Tapi hal tersebut tergantung warga Libanon secara keseluruhan.'

Norman:
Saya sangat setuju. Saya tidak mengatakan apa yang harus anda lakukan dengan hidup anda,
dan jika anda memutuskan untuk hidup merangkak, saya dapat menghargai itu. Saya menghargai pilihan itu. Tiap orang ingin hidup.
Bagaimana saya menolak hak anda tersebut?
Tapi lantas, bagaimana saya tidak boleh menghormati orang yang mengatakan lebih baik baik mati berdiri?
Bagaimana saya tidak bisa menghormati sikap tersebut?
Israel dan Amerika Serikat melakukan penyerangan,
karena mereka tidak akan pernah membiarkan perlawanan militer untuk menguasai daerah tersebut.
Dan itu merupakan masalah.
Jika HIzbullah menyerah, dan mengatakan: :"Kita akan melakukan apapun yang Amerika mau",
tentu saja tidak akan ada perang - hal itu benar,
tapi anda juga jadi budaknya Amerika.

Saya menghormati orang-orang yang menolak untuk menjadi budak.

Interviewer:
Apakah tidak ada jalan lain selain perlawanan militer?

Norman:
Saya tidak percaya bahwa ada cara lain. Saya juga berharap ada cara lain.
Siapa yang menginginkan perang? Siapa yang menginginkan kerusakan?
Bahkan Hitler tidak menginginkan perang.
Dia lebih memilih jika ada jalan lain atau jalan damai untuk mencapai tujuannya.
Jika dia bisa.
Jadi saya tidak mengatakan bahwa saya menginginkannya, tapi saya harus jujur tidak melihat jalan lain,
kecuali jika anda memilih untuk jadi budak - dan banyak orang di sini memilih jalan tersebut.

Saya tidak bisa berkata,,,
bahwa saya bisa memahaminya - anda ingin hidup.

Saya tidak bisa benar-benar berkata saya menghormati sikap tersebut.
Tahukah anda, telah banyak orang meninggal, terlalu banyak kerusakan
Bahkan sebelum mayat-mayat itu dikuburkan,
sebelum bahkan gedung-gedung dibangun kembali,orang yang bertanggung jawab atas hal itu semua - anda tidak bisa menunggu untuk menyambut dia. Anda tidak bisa menunggu untuk menggulung karpet merah (sambutan penghormatan) . Saya tidak bisa menghormati hal demikian.

Dalam hal tersebut, saya lebih menyukai orang Yahudi. Saya suka akan sikap mereka. Apakah anda tahu apa sikap orang Yahudi yang saya suka? "Never to forgive, never to forget" (Tidak akan pernah memaafkan, Tidak akan pernah lupa). Saya setuju atas sikap tersebut. Siapa yang menggulung karpet merah setelah kurang dari dua tahun negeri anda dihancurkan oleh mereka? Sekertaris Negara
mengatakan peristiwa itu adalah masa sakit masa kelahiran Timur Tengah baru. Itu merupakan pernyataan orang gila. Orang gila akan membandingkan kehancuran sebuah negara dengan kelahiran seorang bayi, dan ternyata, orang di masih sangat menginginkan untuk menyambut dia. Mereka mencoba untuk menebak-nebak apa yang orang Amerika pikirkan. Mereka tak sabar untuk menjamunya. Bagaimana seseorang bisa menghormati sikap demikian?

Jika membandingkan dengan sikap tersebut saya seribu kali lebih menghormati orang Yahudi - atas sikap mereka, "Never to forgive, Never to Forget".

Setelah begitu banyak kematian dan kerusakan - anda masih rela menyambut orang yang menyebabkan hal tersebut.

Interviewer: Norman...

Norman:
Sikap yang menjijikan!

Siapa yang peduli jika Bush akan datang?

Interviewer: Tapi anda berkata bahwa akan ada perang lagi.

Norman:
Anda harusnya mem-persona non grata kan dia. Dia tidak diterima di sini. Dia telah menghancurkan negara anda. Dia telah bertanggung jawab atas perang yang terjadi. Anda benar-benar mengetahui bahwa resolusi bisa terjadi bisa terjadi tiga minggu sebelumnya. Dia menghancurkan negara anda, dan anda masih ingin menyambut dia. Anda tidak menghormati diri anda sendiri. Bagaimana anda mengharapkan orang lain menghargai orang Arab, jika anda sendiri tidak mempunyai rasa hormat pada diri anda sendiri?

Jika memang warga Libanon banyak yang memilih untuk membiarkan Amerika Serikat dan Israel melakukan agresi mereka, Saya kira anda harus menerimanya. Saya tidak bisa mengatakan bahwa mereka tidak boleh melakukannya. Dengarkan, di negara-negara Eropa yang diduduki Nazi banyak dari mereka yang memilih untuk hidup di bawah pemerintahan Nazi. Isu tentang Perlawanan Perancis hanya omong kosong - hal itu tak pernah terjadi. Perlawanan Perancis...Kira-kira 20% dari seluruh populasi membaca koran Perlawanan/Resistensi. Sisanya berkata: "Jangan melawan," karena Nazi sangatlah kejam. Anda melawan - empat ratus orang meningal dari tiap tentara yang terbunuh. Seperti itulah cara Nazi beroperasi. Jadi, tiap orang Perancis berkata, seperti anda: "Kami ingin hidup." "Jangan melawan." Tapi sekarang saya ingin bertanya kepada anda agar meninjau kembali: Siapa yang kita hormati? Apakah kita menghormati mereka yang mengatakan: "Mari kita hidup," atau kita menghormati mereka yang mengatakan: "Mari kita melawan"?

Para pemimpin datang terakhir. Akan ada seorang pemimpin yang berkuasa di Israel, yang ingin mengakhiri konflik, setelah kondisi mendukung hal tersebut - dengan kata lain Israel harus mengalami kekalahan.

Minggu, 27 Juni 2010

Iwan Fals - Pinggiran Kota Besar




Pinggiran kota besar
Nafasmu makin bingar
Kudengar dari sini
Bagai nyanyian nyamuk

Cerobong asap pabrik
Berlomba ludahi langit
Barisan mobil besar
Gelisah angkut barang

Ada kabar engkau tuli

Pinggiran kota besar
Kulihat tidur mendengkur
Diranjang banyak orang
Peduli kau bermimpi

Selagi cukup nyenyak
Asiknya buang kotoran
Lukai hari kami
Cemari hati ini

Ada kabar engkau buta

Sungai kotor bau dan beracun
Penuh limbah kimia
Kita mandi mencuci disana
Lihatlah lihatlah

Ikan ikan pergi atau mati
Tak kulihat yang pasti
Kau yang tidur bangunlah segera
Lihatlah lihatlah

Telanjang anak kecil
Berenang disungai kotor
Tertawa riang bercanda
Sambil menggaruk koreng

Pinggiran kota besar
Merasa tidur terganggu
Beranjak dari ranjang
Tutup pintu jendela
Nutup pintu jendela

Sungai kotor bau dan beracun
Penuh limbah kimia
Kita mandi mencuci disana
Lihatlah lihatlah

Ikan ikan pergi atau mati
Tak kulihat yang pasti
Kau yang tidur bangunlah segera
Lihatlah lihatlah

Hitam kaliku
Hitam legam hatiku
Legam hariku
Legam hitam kaliku

3-Legitimate Demands [2] Barrak's Dilemma by Azzam the American(3of3)




2-Legitimate Demands [2] Barrak's Dilemma by Azzam the American (2of3)




Sabtu, 26 Juni 2010

1-Legitimate Demands [2] Barrak's Dilemma by Azzam the American (1of3)




Al-Qaidah, awal pekan ini menyeru Presiden AS, Barrack Obama untuk menghentikan semua campur tangan di bidang agama, masyarakat, ekonomi dan pemerintahan di dunia Islam. Seruan itu dinyatakan oleh jurubicara kelompok Mujahidin tersebut dalam pesan video yang tayang di situs online Islamist.

Sang jurubicara, Adam Yahiye Gadahn, meminta Obama tak lagi mengurusi kurikulum pendidikan di negara tersebut dan menghentikan siaran yang menyasar dunia Muslim. Ia menyebut terutama siaran yang didesain untuk mengalihkan keyakinan atau merusak iman, pikiran, moral, dan nilai orang-orang Muslim.

Gadahn juga mengatakan kemungkinan membuka pintu perdamaian dengan Washington dengan syarat, AS harus menarik tentaranya dari Afghanistan dan Irak. Tak hanya itu, AS juga diminta mengakhiri dukungannya terhadap Israel dan membebaskan tahanan Muslim.

“Legitimate Demands 2, Barack's Dilemma,” demikian nama pesan video tersebut diproduksi divisi media Al Qaidah. Sang Jurubicara terlihat mengenakan turban putih dan berkomunikasi dengan Bahasa Inggris dengan terjemahan teks Bahasa Arab.

Gadahn mengatakan, kekalahan partai Demokrat pada Januari dalam perebutan satu kursi Senat--atau majelis tinggi--di negara bagian Massachusetts, AS, menggarisbawahi penurunan popularitas Obama.

"Kamu bukan lagi pria populer seperti dulu, setahun lalu atau sebelunya. Jangan biarkan penghormatan yang anda dapat di mana pun anda berada membodohimu. Lagi pula, tidakkah mereka semua bertepuk tangan untuk George W Bush hingga di hari ia meninggalkan kantor dengan penuh rasa malu?"

Gadahn, yang juga dikenal sebagai Azzam al-Amriki, sudah kerap muncul di sejumlah video Al Qaidah. Ia pun masuk dalam daftar orang yang paing diinginkan FBI sejak 2004.

Dalam video berdurasi 24 menit itu, Gadhan tidak hanya menyeru presiden AS menarik seluruh pasukan, tapi juga mata-mata, penasihat keamanan, pelatih, semua lembaga terkait, bisnis, robot, kendaraan dan personil AS lain, juga kapal dan pesawat dari seluruh negara Muslim, dari Afghanistan dan juga dari Zanzibar.

Terkait penghentian dukungan terhadap Israel, Gadahn menyeru pemerintahan Obama balik memboikot Israel dan menghentikan dukungan terhadap rezim yang menindas Palestina. Ia juga menekankan sekali lagi pembebasan tahanan Muslim yang disekap AS.

Gadahn adalah lelaki asli keturunan AS. Ia beralih memeluk Islam dan melabeli dirinya jurubicara Al Qaidah untuk Amerika. (muslimdaily)

Kamis, 24 Juni 2010

Khusus untuk yg masih merasa muslim




Wahai akhifillah, beritahu aku,
kapankah kau akan marah?

Jika milik kita yang suci dihina,
dan tempat kita dihancurkan,

dan kau tidak menjadi marah?

Jika sifat ksatria kita dibunuh,
dan kehormatan kita diinjak-injak,

dan dunia kita berakhir,
dan kau tidak menjadi marah?

Jadi beritahu aku,
kapankah kau akan marah?

Jika sumberdaya kita dirampas,
dan institusi kita diruntuhkan,

dan masjid-masjid kita dihancurkan,
dan masjid al-Aqsa dan al-Quds kita
tetap dirampas,
dan kau tidak menjadi marah?

Jadi beritahu aku,
kapankah kau akan marah?

Musuhku, atau musuhmu,
menghina kehormatan,

darahku dijadikan mainan oleh dia,
dan kau jadi penonton permainan.

Jika untuk Allah, untuk suatu yang suci,
untuk Islam kau tidak marah,

Jadi beritahu aku,
kapankah kau akan marah?

Aku melihat kengerian,
Aku melihat darah mengucur.

Wanita-wanita tua mengiringi
anak-anak menjemput maut mereka.

Aku telah melihat segala macam bentuk penindasan.
Dan kau tidak menjadi marah.

Jadi beritahu aku,
kapankah kau akan marah?

Dan kau duduk seperti boneka bisu,
perutmu memenuhi kantor.

Kau habiskan malam banggakan angka-angka,
dengan uang, curahkan dirimu kepada berkas-berkasnya.

Aku melihat kematian diatas kepala-kepala kami.
Dan kau tidak menjadi marah.

Jadi terus terang saja padaku,
jangan malu-malu:

kamu ada di Ummat yang mana?

Jika kau juga derita, apa yang kami derita,
tidak menjadikan kamu ingin membalas,

maka tidak usah repot.

Karena kamu bukanlah kami, maupun bagian dari kami,
bahkan kamu bukan bagian dari dunia manusia.

Jadi hiduplah sebagai kelinci,
dan matilah sebagai kelinci.

Sabtu, 19 Juni 2010

Behind 911 and Gaza




the 911, was it an action? or merely just a reaction?
and the Gaza Massacre, who's responsible?


Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZwTo7YK1Z60

According to the reports, facts and analysis of Norman G. Finkelstein and Ron Paul.


Pembantaian Gaza, Siapa yang bertanggungjawab?

Berikut ini jawaban Norman G. Finklestein, seorang penulis dan ahli ilmu politik Amerika:

"Menurutku perkembangan yang penting adalah apa yang dikatakan oleh Amnesty International Setelah invasi atas Gaza. Mereka menunjukkan laporan yang sangat subtansial yang berjudul "Fueling Conflict" (Memberi bahan bakar konflik). Dan laporan ini mengatakan, "memberikan senjata kepada pihak yang terus melakukan pelanggaran Hak-hak Asasi Manusia adalah ilegal menurut Hukum Internasional.

Israel adalah negara yang terus melakukan pelanggaran Hak-hak Asasi Manusia, dan karena itu harus ada embargo senjata yang komprehensif atas Israel. Lalu laporan itu memaparkan setiap negara di dunia, bagaimana mereka mensuplai dan mengirim senjata ke Israel, tetapi harus dikatakan, bahwa fokusnya adalah Amerika Serikat.

Amnesty International mengungkapkan 3 hal utama: 1) Bahwa AS sejauh ini adalah penyuplai senjata terbesar Israel. 2) Mensuplai senjata-senjata itu tidak hanya ilegal menurut Hukum Internasional, tetapi juga ilegal menurut Hukum Amerika sendiri. Dan ke-3, dalam laporan ini disebutkan, saya pikir penting bagi kalian untuk mendengarnya. Amnesty International menyatakan bahwa apa yang terjadi di Gaza, mereka menggambarkan apa yang terjadi di Gaza merupakan 22 hari kematian dan penghancuran. Apa yang terjadi di Gaza, tidak akan terjadi, tanpa uang pembayar pajak AS.

Jika anda tertarik dengan apa yang terjadi di Gaza, ingin mengetahui bagaimana kematian yang terjadi di sana, penghancuran, serangan yang sistematis atas mesjid-mesjid, serangan yang sistematis atas ambulans-ambulans, serangan-serangan sistematis atas rumah sakit, atas sekolah, 6000 rumah yang dihancurkan atau hampir sepenuhnya dihancurkan. Menurut Amnesty International, seluruhnya dibayar oleh uang para pembayar AS!

Lalu kini Hillary Clinton meningkatkan lagi bantuan militer AS kepada Israel, dia lupa bahwa, pertama, tindakan tersebut merupakan pelanggaran terhadap Hukum Internasional dan hukum AS sendiri. Ke-dua, Amerika Serikat lah yang telah memungkinkan - anda harus ingat, ya, saya tahu bahwa program anda menyoroti juga penggunaan Fosfor Putih (White phosporous), Setiap shell fosfor putih yang mereka temukan, anda bisa lihat dalam Laporan Human Rights Watch, Semuanya (fosfor putih) dibuat di Amerika Serikat.

Kita (warga Amerika) lah yang bertanggungjawab atas perang (Gaza) tersebut. Ini bukan hanya sekedar klise, ini adalah hal yang faktual. Kitalah yang telah membuat pembantaian itu terjadi."



Lalu, bagaimana dengan serangan 911?
Siapa yang sebenarnya memulai peperangan ini?

Ini adalah pengakuan dari Ron Paul, seorang anggota Kongres AS dari Partai Republik:

"Menurut saya, kesalahfahaman dan ketidaksepakatan yang kami miliki dalam perdebatan ini adalah asal-mula ancaman tersebut. Saya sangat peduli atas asal mula ancaman terorisme sebagaimana yang lainnya, tetapi mereka tidak menyerang kita, karena kita bebas dan sejahtera.

Semua radikalisme, semua elemen, semua agama memiliki potensi kekerasan, tapi jika kita tidak mengerti, bahwa reaksi tersebut lahir karena kita menginvasi negeri-negeri mereka, kita mengokupasi negeri-negeri mereka, kita membangun pangkalan-pangkalan militer di negeri-negeri mereka.

Kita tentu saja tidak bisa begitu saja mengesampingkan 911, tetapi kita telah melakukannya sejak dulu. Pangkalan Angkatan Udara (AS) di Arab Saudi yang telah dibangun sejak sebelum 911 -lah yang telah memberi mereka (Al-Qaida) alasan.

Jika kita tidak memahami hal ini, kita tidak akan memenangkan perang melawan terorisme ini.

Jumat, 18 Juni 2010

Lobby (AIPAC) Israel to USA

Rating:★★★★★
Category:Movies
Genre: Documentary
Kesaksian dari dalam : Lobby Israel (AIPAC)ZIONIS cengkram dunia, A News report (Zionists Rule The World By PROXY )"Ini adalah Film yang menggegerkan kaum Zionis dan patut ditonton untuk menambah wawasan,pengetahuan dan pandangan anda".Please write your comment thanks.



DOWNLOAD

Terkait:
- Orang yg masih mempertanyakan sikap Zionis-AS terhadap Islam: Terbukti GILA